A user in Brainly called BabyTee9493 asked about something about social studies. The question was posted on August 13, 2020. BabyTee9493 started the question by explaining the case. Basically, you learn one of the subjects from your study and will be admitted to prison next week.
You emphasize that it is in the best interest of the subject to stay in the study while incarcerated. The problem is, the study was not approved by the IRB in accordance with the requirements for research involving prisoners under Suppart C. BabyTee9493 asked the best course of action.
So, what is the best course of the action? There is only one answer to the question asked by BabyTee9493. It was made by annyksl. She said that modifying the elements of the research that were not approved by the IRB is the best course of action, even if it implies the removal of the subject who will be admitted to prison, or talk to the penitentiary authorities if something is able to be completed for the subject to join the research, and then report to the IRB.
Here is the explanation of the answer. Each research carried out has to be within the guidelines that the IRB proposes. For this thing, if a certain research is disapproved by the IRB, it must have factors modified and adapted so that it is able to be approved and carried out by IRB and, even if it excludes the possibility of participation of volunteers who put interested in research and cannot due to several situation such as illnesses, prisons, among others.
In the original test, the question includes some options (answers). There are four options that you can select as the answer to the question. The first option is to stop all research activities with the subject immediately. The second one is to notify OHRP and request an exception. The third one is to withdraw the subject from the study and delete the collected data. The fourth one is to notify the IRBB promptly and allow the subject to remain in the study while the IRB makes the determinations required by the regulations.
Sometimes, research with human subjects can result in a dilemma for investigators. When the purposes of the research are designed to make main contributions to the field, such as improving the understanding of a disease process or determining the efficacy of an intervention, investigators may think that the outcomes of their studies are more important compared to providing protections for individual participants in the research. Even though it can be understood as the focus of the goals, society values the rights of someone.
