Apparently, there are some people who look for the answer for a policy area on which moralistic conservatives have already agreed with traditional conservatives but disagreed with individualistic conservatives. We have some options for that question:
- The free market.
- Gay marriage.
- Tax cuts for working families.
- National defense.
The answer is ‘B’, Gay Marriage. To get further information about Gay Marriage, here we are going to share some information about that. Make sure that you read this entire article. Or if you want to find out some cases or you have any questions, you are able to sign up to Brainly or Chegg Study to find a solution.
According to the research, same-sex marriage has been legal in the United State of Texas since the United States Supreme Court ruling of Obergefell Hodges on June 26, 2015. Before that ruling, same-sex marriage was not legal in Texas, even though a state court reserved the Travis County clerk to issue one marriage license to two women on February 19, 2015, with reason the illness of one of them. On February 26, 2014, Judge Orlando, of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, discovered that Texas’s ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. Later, on April 23, 2014, Judge Barbara Nellermoe, of the 45th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, discovered that Texas’s ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. In fact, both of cases were appealed. Within a few months of the Obergefell ruling, all counties had started the issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples with the single exception of Irion County.
According to the research, in 1997s, the Texas Legislature restricted the issuance of marriage licenses to same-sex couples. In 2003s, the Legislature assigned a statute that made void in Texas any same-sex marriage or civil union. Also, this statute restricts the state or any agency or political subdivision of the state from providing effect to same-sex marriages or civil unions performed in other jurisdictions. In December 2016, Senator Jose filed a bill in the Texas Legislature to formally abolish the state’s ban on same-sex marriage. Later, on November 8, 2005, the Texas voters approved the Texas Proposition II that amended the Texas Constitution to assign marriage as consisting only of the union of one man and one woman and disallowing the state or any political subdivision of the state from making or recognizing any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
In other cases, in Austin, another couple of same-sex marriage that married in Massachusetts coarse for divorce, and then the district court answered the divorce before the Attorney General could intervene. The Attorney General appealed that decision too. However, on January 7, 2011, the Third Court of Appeals in Austin held that the state had no right to intervene to challenge the divorce on appeal. The Texas Supreme Court heard those arguments on November 5, 2013. Later, on June 19, 2015, the Supreme Court upheld the lower court in a 5–3 decision stating that the Attorney General did not have standing to intervene. Finally, the divorce has been granted, although the marriage has never been recognized by the State of Texas.
Related to the question, now you only need to know some information about Traditionalist conservatism and Individualist conservatism. To find out that information, just look at the following text.
Traditionalist conservatism, also referred to as traditional conservatism, classical conservatism, or simply as traditionalism. It is a political and social philosophy that emphasizes the need for the principles of a transcendent moral order, manifested through certain natural laws to which society ought to conform in a prudent manner. While Toryism said that traditionalist conservatism is a conservatism based on the political philosophies of Aristotle and Edmund Burke. Traditionalists accentuate the bonds of social order and the defense of ancestral institutions over what it considers excessive individualism.
Apparently, Traditionalist conservatism gives a strong emphasis on the notions of custom, tradition and convention. The theoretical reason is derided over and it is considered against the practical reason. Also, the state is seen as a communal enterprise with spiritual and organic qualities. Traditionalists trust that any change is not the result of intentional reasoned thought, but flows out naturally of the traditions of the community. The leadership, authority and hierarchy are seen as natural products. Aside from that, traditionalism extended 18th-century Europe, especially as a response to the disorder of the English Civil War and the radicalism of the French Revolution. In the middle of the 20th century, traditionalist conservatism began to organize itself in earnest as an intellectual and political force.
Individualism is the political philosophy, moral stance, ideology and social outlook which emphasizes the moral worth of the individual. Individualists promote the exercise of one’s goals and desires people so value independence and self-reliance as well as advocate that interests of the individual should achieve precedence over the state or a social group while fulminating the external interference upon one’s own interests by society or institutions such as the government. We get information that individualism is usually defined in contrast to totalitarianism, collectivism and more corporate social forms.
In fact, individualism creates the individual as its focus, so starts with the fundamental premise which the human individual is of primary importance in the struggle for liberation. For your information, anarchism, liberalism and existentialism are examples of movements which take the human individual as a central unit of analysis. Also, individualism involves the right of the individual to freedom and self-realization. Individualism has been used as a term denoting the quality of being an individual; individuality related to possessing an individual characteristic. Aside from that, individualism is also associated with artistic and bohemian interests and lifestyles where there is a tendency towards self-creation and experimentation as opposed to traditional or popular mass opinions and behaviors such as with humanist philosophical positions and ethics.